Data centers in Spokane County, Washington
The map shows 7 data center sites in Spokane County, Washington. The operators named are Tierpoint, Kiemle & Hagood, Lumen Technologies, OneEighty Networks and TierPoint.
Sites
- Iron Mountain
- Lumen: Lumen Technologies
- Spokane: TierPoint
- Spokane: OneEighty Networks
- TierPoint: Tierpoint
- Tierpoint Spokane Data Centers SPO01/02: Tierpoint
- US Bank Building: Kiemle & Hagood
Operators
- Tierpoint: 2 sites
- Kiemle & Hagood: 1 site
- Lumen Technologies: 1 site
- OneEighty Networks: 1 site
- TierPoint: 1 site
Power plants in Spokane County
Spokane County has 7 power plants, with 160 MW of capacity: natural gas 70 MW, hydro 67 MW, biomass 23 MW.
- Northeast (WA): Natural gas, 45 MW
- Nine Mile: Hydro, 38 MW
- Boulder Park: Natural gas, 25 MW
- Spokane Waste to Energy: Biomass, 23 MW
- Monroe Street: Hydro, 15 MW
- Upper Falls: Hydro, 10 MW
- Upriver Dam Hydro Plant: Hydro, 5 MW
Other large power plants within 50 km
- Rathdrum Power LLC: Natural gas, 210 MW, 32 km away, Idaho
- Rathdrum: Natural gas, 132 MW, 36 km away, Idaho
- Long Lake: Hydro, 90 MW, 45 km away, Washington
- Post Falls: Hydro, 18 MW, 26 km away, Idaho
- Plummer Cogen: Biomass, 6 MW, 47 km away, Idaho
- Fighting Creek LFGTE Plant: Biomass, 3 MW, 31 km away, Idaho
Sources
Data centers: Epoch AI (CC BY); OpenStreetMap via the public Overpass API (ODbL, © OpenStreetMap contributors); Ringmast4r Global-Data-Center-Map (custom permissive license, attribution required); location attributes from WorldPop (R2025A), Global Solar Atlas PVOUT, Global Wind Atlas 4, USFS Wildfire Hazard Potential, the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model and the previous publish's lines and substations; gas distances and county queue from the previous publish's EIA gas pipelines and LBNL Queued Up requests; nearest city from Natural Earth populated places; generation within 20 km from the previous publish's plants; cooling degree days from NOAA NCEI nClimDiv county normals; elevation and slope from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (ESA, via AWS Open Data); water stress from WRI Aqueduct 4.0; ozone nonattainment from the EPA Green Book; drought from the U.S. Drought Monitor; tribal land from US Census TIGER/Line. License: CC BY; ODbL; custom permissive; WRI Aqueduct CC BY 4.0; USFS, USGS, EIA, NOAA, EPA, US Census and Natural Earth public domain; Copernicus DEM GLO-30 © DLR e.V. and Airbus Defence and Space GmbH; the U.S. Drought Monitor courtesy of NDMC
Power plants: EIA-860M (US); NRCan NACEI (Canada, Mexico); WRI GPPD (Mexico); OpenStreetMap via Geofabrik (Canada, Mexico gap fill); USGS USWTDB/USPVDB; EPA eGRID; Natural Earth admin-1; HIFLD control areas; location attributes from WorldPop (R2025A), Global Solar Atlas PVOUT, Global Wind Atlas 4, USFS Wildfire Hazard Potential, the USGS National Seismic Hazard Model and the previous publish's lines and substations; water distances from OpenStreetMap via Geofabrik; gas distances and county queue from the previous publish's EIA gas pipelines and LBNL Queued Up requests; nearest city from Natural Earth populated places; cooling degree days from NOAA NCEI nClimDiv county normals; elevation and slope from the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (ESA, via AWS Open Data); water stress from WRI Aqueduct 4.0; ozone nonattainment from the EPA Green Book; drought from the U.S. Drought Monitor; tribal land from US Census TIGER/Line. License: ODbL (derivative database; EIA content is public domain, NRCan OGL-Canada, WRI GPPD CC BY 4.0; location attributes from WorldPop, Global Solar Atlas, Global Wind Atlas, LBNL Queued Up and WRI Aqueduct CC BY 4.0, USFS, USGS, EIA, NOAA, EPA, US Census and Natural Earth public domain, Copernicus DEM GLO-30 © DLR e.V. and Airbus Defence and Space GmbH, the U.S. Drought Monitor courtesy of NDMC)